Author:
Goodfellow John,O'Connor John,Pandit Hemant,Dodd Christopher,Murray David
Abstract
The results of UKA can be gathered from three main sources: the reports of the national registers, observational studies (both comparative and case series), and randomised controlled trials. In this chapter, we attempt an overview of the clinical results of UKA in general and OUKA in particular. It is important to note that the ‘result’ is of the whole arthroplasty which includes the indications, the technique as well as the implant.
Reference156 articles.
1. Esler C, Roberts V, Harper W. 15 year outcome of 4665 primary knee arthroplasties: Results from a UK joint register. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting, San Francisco, USA, 2008.
2. Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu KJ. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties--a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(8): 1037-41.
3. Health Outcome Measures in the Evaluation of Total Hip Arthroplasties—A Comparison Between the Harris Hip Score and the Oxford Hip Score
4. Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ, Murray DW. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(12): 1628-31.
5. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献