Affiliation:
1. California Miramar University
2. Technical University of Kenya
3. Karatina University
Abstract
In Kenya, the number of private schools has increased more than four times since the introduction of the Free Primary Education (FPE) policy in 2003. The number of children attending private primary schools increased from 4.6% in 2004 to 11.5% in 2007. With such increment, there has been challenges on the determinants of growth of education institutions. It is against this background that the study examined the influence of physical planning on the growth of private primary schools in Kenya. the study was anchored in the resource dependency view where the managers of institutions have the ability to acquire, Plan and maintain resources that are important to the growth of an organization. The target population in this study comprised of 7,418 private primary schools in all eight regions of Kenya. Cluster sampling technique was employed of 50% of the target regions were sampled, leading to four out of eight regions being selected. From these regions random sampling was then used to select 320 respondents who were either the principals’/Head teachers or deputy principal of the schools. A questionnaire was used to collect data and Structural Equation Modeling was used to analyse data. The study found a strong and significant correlation between physical planning and growth of primary schools. This study therefore recommended that physical planning was an important factor in determining growth of private schools. The study further recommends that owners of private primary schools should be aware of the facilities that are crucial and most important to students in the teaching and learning. This will intern influence the growth of the private primary schools in Kenya.
Publisher
Academia Europea de Direccion y Economia de la Empresa
Reference24 articles.
1. Altonji, J., Elder, T., and Taber, C. (2015). Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of catholic schools. Journal of Political Economy, 113(01):151-184. https://doi.org/10.1086/426036
2. Andrabi, T., Das, J., and Khwaja, A. (2018). A dime a day: The possibilities and limits of private schooling in Pakistan. Comparative Education Review, 52(3):329-355. https://doi.org/10.1086/588796
3. Bold, T., Kimenyi, M., Mwabu, G., and Sandefur, J. (2013). The high return to low-cost private schooling in a developing country. London: International Growth Centre (IGC) London School of Economics. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1973021
4. Civelek, M (2018) Essentials of structural modeling. Zea-E-Books 64 https//digital commons.unl.edu/zeabook/64
5. Desai, S., Dubey, A., Vanneman, R., Banerji, R. (2019). Private schooling in India: A new educational landscape. In India Policy Forum. National Council of Applied Economic Research. (5)138.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献