Comparisons of the NGA Ground-Motion Relations

Author:

Abrahamson Norman1,Atkinson Gail2,Boore David3,Bozorgnia Yousef4,Campbell Kenneth5,Chiou Brian6,Idriss I. M.7,Silva Walter8,Youngs Robert9

Affiliation:

1. Pacific Gas & Electric Company, 245 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94105

2. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont. Canada N6A 5B7

3. U.S. Geological Survey, MS977, 345 Middlefield Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025

4. Pacific earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720

5. ABS Consulting/EQECAT, 1130 NW 161st Pl., Beaverton, OR 97006-6337

6. Division of Research and Innovation, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA

7. Professor Emeritus, University of California, Davis

8. Pacific Engineering and Analysis, El Cerrito, CA 94546

9. Geomatrix Consultants Inc., 2101 Webster St., 12th Floor, Oakland CA 94612

Abstract

The data sets, model parameterizations, and results from the five NGA models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions are compared. A key difference in the data sets is the inclusion or exclusion of aftershocks. A comparison of the median spectral values for strike-slip earthquakes shows that they are within a factor of 1.5 for magnitudes between 6.0 and 7.0 for distances less than 100 km. The differences increase to a factor of 2 for M5 and M8 earthquakes, for buried ruptures, and for distances greater than 100 km. For soil sites, the differences in the modeling of soil/sediment depth effects increase the range in the median long-period spectral values for M7 strike-slip earthquakes to a factor of 3. The five models have similar standard deviations for M6.5-M7.5 earthquakes for rock sites and for soil sites at distances greater than 50 km. Differences in the standard deviations of up to 0.2 natural log units for moderate magnitudes at all distances and for large magnitudes at short distances result from the treatment of the magnitude dependence and the effects of nonlinear site response on the standard deviation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3