Potential Losses in a Repeat of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake

Author:

Wong Ivan1,Bouabid Jawhar2,Graf William3,Huyck Charles4,Porush Allan5,Silva Walter6,Siegel Timothy7,Bureau Gilles8,Eguchi Ronald9,Knight John10

Affiliation:

1. Principal Seismologist, Seismic Hazards Group, URS Corporation, 1333 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612

2. Project Director, PBS&J, 5665 New Northside Dr., Suite 400, Atlanta, GA 30328

3. Manager, Earthquake Risk, URS Corporation, 915 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA 90017

4. Senior Vice President, ImageCat, Inc., 400 Oceangate #1050, Long Beach, CA 90802

5. Principal Structural Engineer, URS Corporation, 915 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA 90017

6. Principal Seismologist, Pacific Engineering & Analysis, 311 Pomona Ave., El Cerrito, CA 94530

7. Senior Engineer, S&Maine, Inc., 1413 Topside Rd., Knoxville, TN 37777

8. Consultant, formerly with URS Corporation, 1333 Broadway, Suite 800, Oakland, CA 94612

9. President, ImageCat, Inc., 400 Oceangate #305, Long Beach, CA 90802

10. Risk Assessment Program Manager, South Carolina Emergency Management Division, 1100 Fish Hatchery Rd., West Columbia, SC 29172

Abstract

A comprehensive earthquake loss assessment for the state of South Carolina using HAZUS was performed considering four different earthquake scenarios: a moment magnitude ( M) 7.3 “1886 Charleston-like” earthquake, M 6.3 and M 5.3 events also from the Charleston seismic source, and an M 5.0 earthquake in Columbia. Primary objectives of this study were (1) to generate credible earthquake losses to provide a baseline for coordination, capability development, training, and strategic planning for the South Carolina Emergency Management Division, and (2) to raise public awareness of the significant earthquake risk in the state. Ground shaking, liquefaction, and earthquake-induced landsliding hazards were characterized using region-specific inputs on seismic source, path, and site effects, and ground motion numerical modeling. Default inventory data on buildings and facilities in HAZUS were either substantially enhanced or replaced. Losses were estimated using a high resolution 2- km×2- km grid rather than the census tract approach used in HAZUS. The results of the loss assessment indicate that a future repeat of the 1886 earthquake would be catastrophic, resulting in possibly 900 deaths, more than 44,000 injuries, and a total economic loss of $20 billion in South Carolina alone. Schools, hospitals, fire stations, ordinary buildings, and bridges will suffer significant damage due to the general lack of seismic design in the state. Lesser damage and losses will be sustained in the other earthquake scenarios although even the smallest event could result in significant losses.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Reference15 articles.

1. Magnitudes and Locations of the 1811-1812 New Madrid, Missouri, and the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquakes

2. Bollinger, G.A. , 1977. Reinterpretation of the intensity data for the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake, in Studies Related to the Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake of 1886: A Preliminary Report, edited by D. W. Rankin ,U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper1028, pp. 17–32.

3. Bollinger, G.A., Johnston, A.C., Talwani, P., Long, L.T., Shedlock, K.M., Sibol, M.S., and Chapman, M.C. , 1991. Seismicity of the southeastern United States; 1698 to 1986, inNeotectonics of North America, edited by D. B. Slemmons , E. R. Engdahl , M. D. Zoback , and D. Blackwell , Geological Society of America, Decade Map Volume I, pp. 291–308.

4. Bouabid, J., Wong, I., Bureau, G., Graf, W., Huyck, C., Porush, A., Siegel, T., Silva, W., Swigart, M., Eguchi, R., Rouleau, J., Knight, J., and Dreher, T. , 2002. A comprehensive seismic vulnerability and loss evaluation of the state of South Carolina using HAZUS: Part I—Overview and results,7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Proceedings(CD-ROM).

5. Bureau, G., and Ballentine, G.D. , 2002. A comprehensive seismic vulnerability and loss evaluation of the state of South Carolina using HAZUS: Part VI—Dam inventory and vulnerability assessment methodology,7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Proceedings(CD-ROM).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3