Affiliation:
1. Fakultas Ilmu Kelautan Perikanan Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar. Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan KM.10, Makassar, Indonesia
2. Fakultas Perikanan Universitas Cokroaminoto Makassar, JL. Perintis Kemerdekaan KM.11, Makassar, Indonesia
Abstract
Fishing communities in South Sulawesi are known as Punggawa-Sawi. Numerous researches have shown that the partnership between punggawa-sawi is considered as an “exploitation”, judging from its profit-sharing system. Purse seine is a Tuna fishing vessel with 5 to 8 sawi and 1 punggawa. The focus of this study is to explain the fisherman’s preference of performing partnership with the punggawa and the values they implement between the work system. There are 8 groups of purse seine fisherman as the sample with a consideration that there were similarities in the pattern of working relationships and fishing activities. This research used qualitative approach and analyzed by descriptive correlation. The results showed that the recruitment of sawi by the punggawa was based on affinity (25%), experience (12,5%), needs for the ship operation (62,5%). The termination of the applicant can be caused by untruthfulness (50%), illness (12,5%), career change (37,5%). The compensation that is originally accepted by the sawi who quits, will be moved to the afflicted ones. The reasons to become sawi is (1) blood relative (20%), assurance of family economic sustainability (65%), and (3). Difficulty to find another job (15%). The profit-sharing system by the retainer is based on 3 reasons, i.e: (1), retainer investment (55%) (2), high risk (30%) and continuing the existing system (20%). Punggawa-sawi fishing communities have strength in the value of social relations that are built on the basis of shared needs (62.5%) and trust (37.5%). The existence of the punggawa-sawi is because of the social security provided to the retainer’s family (87.5%), both in the form of loans and assistance, and the personality of the retainer (12.5%).
Publisher
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference23 articles.
1. Adam, L. 2015. Telaah Kebijakan Perlindungan Nelayan Dan Pembudi Daya Ikan Di Indonesia. Kajian, 20(2), 145–162.
2. Alpiani, A. 2019. Pola Hubungan dan Sistem Bagi Hasil Punggawa-Sawi pada Alat Tangkap Bagan Rambo di Kabupaten Barru. Gorontalo, 2(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.32662/gfj.v2i1
3. Alpiani, A., Massiseng, A. N. A., & Ummung, A. 2022. The Exchange Rate Of Bagan Rambo Fishermen In Barru District . Barru Regency , South Sulawesi. 104–112.
4. Badan Karantina Ikan Pengendalian Mutu dan Keamanan Hasil Perikanan. 2021. KKP | Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan. https://kkp.go.id/artikel/26820-produk-kelautan-dan-perikanan-makassar-jangkau-50-negara-selama-tahun-2020
5. Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Sulawesi Selatan. 2018. Statistik Perikanan Sulawesi Selatan.