Comparative Analysis of Students' Biology Learning Outcomes: Memory and Understanding Aspects

Author:

Yusipa Yanti

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This research aims to analyze the learning outcomes of 11th-grade students by examining how they answer questions using memory aspects, evaluate the overall learning outcomes of the class, and identify the differences in learning outcomes between students who use memory aspects and those who use comprehension aspects to solve questions. Methodology: This study is a true experimental study. The population in this study were all students of Public High School 6 South Bengkulu totaling 142 people. The sample was taken using a random sampling technique of 42 people was obtained. This study used a learning outcome test instrument in form of multiple choice questions. Data analysis techniques used include descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. Main Findings: The analysis shows that students' abilities are in the moderate category. Biology learning outcomes are in the high category. The results of the hypothesis test show that the significance value is less than 0.05, so Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, which means that there is a significant difference in the learning outcomes of class XI science students at Public High School 6 South Bengkulu who use memory and understanding aspects in answering questions. Novelty/Originality of this study: This type of study can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of both cognitive abilities in understanding and remembering information in the context of learning Biology subjects. In addition, this study can also provide information to educators about more effective ways to help students learn and remember subject matter better.

Publisher

Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia

Reference37 articles.

1. M. Huda, ‘Peran Pendidikan Islam Terhadap Perubahan Sosial’, Edukasia J. Penelit. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 165–188, 2015, doi: 10.21043/edukasia.v10i1.790.

2. E. Cristiana, ‘Digitalisasi pendidikan ditinjau dari perspektif hukum’, in Prosiding Seminar Nasional IAHN-TP Palangka Raya, 2021, no. 3, pp. 58–66, doi: 10.33363/sn.v0i3.89.

3. A. Astalini et al., ‘Identification of Student Character Values in Class X Particle Dynamics Materials’, JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 380–388, 2023.

4. P. D. Darmoko, ‘Peran strategis guru dalam MEA’, J. Ilm. Madaniyah, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 143–156, 2016.

5. S. Halia and R. Linda, ‘Strategi Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru’, UNISAN J., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 491–499, 2023.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3