Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine the applicability of the MURDER type collaborative learning model and the relationship between the implementation of this model on student learning outcomes. Methodology: The design used in this study is the Mix Method. Sampling was carried out by purposive sampling in senior high school 4 Jambi City. The instrument used is the observation sheet and questions. Before the test was carried out, the questions were tried to determine the validity, difficulty level, discriminating power, and reliability of the questions. The prerequisite test used normality and homogeneity tests, while the analysis used Bivariate and Pearson correlation. Main Findings: The results of this study indicate that the implementation of the model by teachers and students through qualitative results is exemplary, with an average quantitative result each for teachers is 78.125% and for students is 70.29%, followed by an average student learning outcomes that reach 75,26. The result of the correlation test is R = 0.717 with a significance value of 0.000 <0.05, which means that there is a significant correlation, while the contribution of the R Square value is 0.514, which means that the implementation of the MURDER type collaborative learning model, contributes to Learning Outcomes of 51.4 %. Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study is the focus on analyzing the application of the MURDER type collaborative learning model and determining its correlation to student learning outcomes at senior high school 4 Jambi City on the subject of reaction rates.
Reference59 articles.
1. M. D. W. Ernawati, S. Sudarmin, A. Asrial, D. Muhammad, and H. Haryanto, “Creative Thinking of Chemistry and Chemistry Education Students in Biochemistry Learning Through Problem Based Learing With Scaffolding Strategy,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 282–295, 2022, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v11i2.33842.
2. D. S. Matovani, S. Istiningsih, and Baiq Niswathul Khair, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Sole (Self Organized Learning Environment) Menggunakan Media Quiziz Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep,” J. Classr. Action Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 139–145, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jcar.v4i4.2231.
3. S. M. Husna, L. Siahaan, U. Saniyyah, and A. M. Kurniawan, “Analisis Perbedaan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI IPA 1 dan XI IPA 2 di MAN 1 Merangin,” J. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 168–174, 2021.
4. Ni Made Ary Suparwati, “Analisis Reduksi Miskonsepsi Kimia dengan Pendekatan Multi Level Representasi: Systematic Literature Review,” J. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 341–348, 2022, doi: 10.37630/jpm.v12i2.591.
5. N. Susanti, L. Simatupang, R. E. Dibyantini, R. A. Syahputra, and E. Ginting, “Hubungan Self-Efficacy dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dengan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa SMA,” J. Inov. Pembelajaran Kim., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 202–208, 2022, doi: 10.24114/jipk.v4i2.39486.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献