The Effects of Standardized Tests on Incorporating 21st Century Skills in Science Classrooms

Author:

Nahar LizoonORCID

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The aim of this article was to investigate how the unintended side effects of standardized testing cause teachers not to integrate 21st century skills i.e., communication, collaboration, creativity, and critical thinking, into science classes. In addition, this study also cross-examineed if certain features of standardized testing have any beneficial impact on the adoption of 21st century skills in science teaching. Methodology: This paper followed the method of narrative review. 85 papers were initially selected after the primary searches. Finally, 30 papers were used to answer two research questions in this article. Main Findings: After analyzing the selected papers, this narrative review revealed three unintended outcomes of standardized testing on the practice of 21st century skills, which are: teachers often prioritize testing over teaching, which results in the fact that there is not enough time for innovative instruction, and the time spent on the actual content of the curriculum is often shortened. On the other hand, the review also found that standardized tests can motivate teachers and enable them to offer their students new opportunities to incorporate 21st century skills into science education by following Assessment guidelines and expanding curricular opportunities.  Novelty/Originality of this study: This study revealed how standardized test-based education practices in science teaching can be analyzed and customized to create a space for cultivating 21st century skills for students.

Publisher

Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia

Subject

General Medicine

Reference36 articles.

1. R. Harshbarger, “Learning in the 21st century: A study addressing educational trends and implications,” Doctoral dissertation, Univ of Central Florida, Florida, USA, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/5043/

2. C. S. Amadi, “The integration of 21st-century skills in science: A Case Study of Canada and the USA,” Education and Urban Society, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 56–87, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1177/00131245211062531.

3. National Science Foundation (NSF), “Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering,”: 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/

4. J. H. McMillan, “The impact of high-stakes test results on teachers’ instructional,” 2005. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED490648

5. Partnership for 21st Century Skills, “21st century readiness for every student: A policymaker’s guide,” 2009, [Online], Available: http://www.p21.org

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3