An observational study to determine whether alignment of endotracheal tube indicator line with the vocal cords results in appropriate depth of intubation

Author:

Kapoor M.C.,Salwan T,Garg S,Puri A,Gupta V

Abstract

Background: Inappropriate endotracheal tube placement depth may be associated with complications. Objective: To determine whether the accurate alignment of the indicator ring on the endotracheal tube at the level of the vocal cords, results in its appropriate placement. Design: Prospective observational study. Patients: 98 adult patients scheduled for general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation. Interventions: The indicator band mark on the endotracheal tube was accurately placed at the vocal cords level under video-laryngoscope view. The tube length at the right upper incisor and the distance between its tip and the carina was measured using fibreoptic bronchoscope. Data to validate methods to predict insertion depth was collected and evaluated. Main Outcome: To determine the distance between the tip of the endotracheal tube and the carina. Results: The endotracheal tube tip depth was inap- propriate in 46.94% cases and was <3 cm above the carina in 41.64% cases. This difference in this distance was similar (p = 0.246) in the two genders. A correlation was noted between topographic length and insertion depth in females only (r2 = 0.201 and p = 0.001). The mean tracheal length was 12.66 + 1.35 cm in males and 12.04 + 1.26 cm in females. Conclusion: We found a high incidence of endo- tracheal tube tip malposition despite the accurate placement of the indicator band at the vocal cords level. We suggest that international endotracheal tube design standards be defined and endotracheal tube manufacturers modify the standard intratracheal length.

Publisher

Universa BV

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3