Methodological Approaches in Qur’anic Studies: A Critique of Michael Cook’s Approach

Author:

Akhtar Dr. Jamil1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

Abstract

This critical study scrutinizes methods that scholars of the Qur'an apply to their research, with a specific emphasis on the major contributions of Michael Cook. The first part of this study starts with a survey of the historiography of Qur'an Studies particularly with the methodological approaches that have significantly contributed to the study of the Qur'an. The narration of prominent works in Qur'anic Studies covers the development of methodologies through the ages by analyzing the crucial contributions of various scholars in the field. Moreover, the study investigates the intellectual achievements of Michael Cook, looking into his conceptual framework and landmark discoveries. Through the application of highly evolved techniques such as text-linguistic analysis, textual exegesis, and comparative religious studies, it evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of Cook's method. It contrasts these with the strengths and weaknesses of alternative methodologies. With this inquiry, we advance the field of Qur'anic Studies by examining Cook's method and also pave the path for further research. This paper seeks to launch discourses on the methodology within the field. This study will encourage researchers to engage in profound and multidisciplinary studies exploring the Qur'an from varied approaches.

Publisher

Africajournals

Reference46 articles.

1. Abdel Haleem, M. A. S. (2010). The Qur'an: A new translation. Oxford University Press.

2. Abdul-Raof, H. (2001). Qur'an translation: Discourse, texture, and exegesis. Curzon Press.

3. Abdul-Rauf, M. (2013). The Qur'an and the Orientalists. Adam Publishers & Distributors.

4. Ahmad, I. (2018). Interpreting the Qur'an: Towards a contemporary approach. Routledge.

5. Ahmed, A. (2020). Methodology of Qur'anic interpretation: Principles and challenges. Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 22(1), 63-79.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3