The Rationality of Ethics: Teleological Theory reconciled in the context of Abortion

Author:

Jibiliza Xolisa1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Theology and Religion University of Fort Hare

Abstract

This paper sought to argue about the notion of abortion, and its immorality within a society. Viewed teleologically, human behaviour such as committing abortion, may be designated as being moral or immoral according to the goals clearly established by a person and reasons given. Teleologic theory thus proposes that the ethical decision for carrying out an abortion focusses on the outcome of the abortion and its outcome on society. Realizing a goal and what one is doing is required and is an adequate condition to consider moral action without bearing in mind any transitional action taken to arrive at a particular objective. The article also seeks to reveal the importance of the biblical view of life as gift emanating from a Creator God. The author places emphasis on the ethical values deemed to be appropriate for Christians based on Holy Scripture relating to life and death issues. The themes for this paper were addressed by the researcher as follows: The immorality on abortion, some reasons given for abortion, the right to abortion, the unborn baby has a right to life, the unwanted pregnancy, Church views on abortion, society’s view on abortion and what is considered to be right or wrong, ethical and unethical in having an abortion.

Publisher

AFRICAJOURNALS

Subject

General Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. Aiken, A. R. A., Gomperts, R. & Trussell, J. (2016). Experiences and characteristics of women seeking and completing at-home medical termination of pregnancy through online telemedicine in Ireland and Northern Ireland: A population-based analysis. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,122(8), 1050–1051.

2. Allanson, S. (2007). Abortion Decision and Ambivalence: Insights via an Abortion Decision Balance Sheet. Clinical Psychologist, 11(2), 50–60.

3. Bentham, J. (2016). On the principles of utility: The principles of morals and legislation. [Available online at http://www.philosophyintrocourse.files.wordpress.com].

4. Bonde, S., Firenze, P., Green, J., Grinberg, M., Korijin, J., Levoy, E., . . . Weisber, L. (2013, May). A framework for making ethical decisions. Available online at www.brown.edu: http://www.brown.edu/academics/science-and-technology-studies/framework-making-ethicaldecisions.

5. Briasoulis, B., Agarwal, V. & Messerli, F.R. (2012). Alcohol Consumption and the Risk of Hypertension in Men and Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 14(11), 792-798.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3