Towards a Linguistic Anthropology of Asian Laughters: Correlating two Contexts

Author:

Yihui Xia,

Abstract

Laughter is a pervasive human behavior that is frequently transcribed into written texts as ‘laughter onomatopoeia’ (LO), to represent the sound of laughter and various emotions within a specific context. Particularly, LO have a rich pragmatic impact on the facilitating of communications (Xia 2021). A such, this study discusses the (LO) of animation in texts in Chinese contexts, and erects a comparison with its translation into Japanese. In particular, the study focuses on the analysis of the interjection and sentence-ending particle as discourse markers in both languages and both cultural contexts. The results of the study suggest that speakers of both Chinese and Japanese employ various LOs to in their pragmatic application of their respective languages, yet these LOs differ between the two languages. For example, in the Chinese context, LOs depicting laughter in social interaction can signify the intention to maintain friendly relations, or to resolve problematic interactions. In the Japanese context, however, speakers largely avoid LO, as such discourse can increase tensions and antagonism between interlocutors.

Publisher

The CALA Unit, SOAS University of London

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Cultural Studies

Reference47 articles.

1. Bennett, W. L., & Feldman, M. S. (1981). Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and judgment in American culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

2. Conley, J. M. and W. M. O'Barr (1990). Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

3. Creaton, J., & Pakes, F. (2012). Adversarial or inquisitorial justice? In Ellis, T. & Savage, S. P. (eds.) Debates in Criminal Justice: KeyTthemes and Issues (pp. 52-60). London and New York: Routledge.

4. Drew, P. (1990). Strategies in the Contest Between Lawyer and Witness in Cross-examination. In Levi, J. N. & Walker, A. G. (eEds.), Language in the Judicial Process (pp. 39-64). New York: Plenum Press.

5. Drew, P. (1992). Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape. In Drew, P. & Heritage, J. D. (eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 470-520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3