Practical no-gold-standard evaluation framework for quantitative imaging methods: application to lesion segmentation in positron emission tomography-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Practical no-gold-standard evaluation framework for quantitative imaging methods: application to lesion segmentation in positron emission tomography

Published:2017-03-03 Issue:1 Volume:4 Page:011011
ISSN:2329-4302
Container-title:Journal of Medical Imaging
language:en
Short-container-title:J. Med. Imag

Author:

Jha Abhinav K.¹,Mena Esther¹,Caffo Brian²,Ashrafinia Saeed³,Rahmim Arman³,Frey Eric³,Subramaniam Rathan M.⁴

Affiliation:

1. Johns Hopkins University, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

2. Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biostatistics, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

3. Johns Hopkins University, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland, United StatescJohns Hopkins University, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

4. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, Dallas, Texas, United States

Publisher

SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Reference53 articles.

1. Methods and Challenges in Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Development

2. Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume Estimated by 18 F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of Stage II or III Disease

3. Total lesion glycolysis in positron emission tomography is a better predictor of outcome than the International Prognostic Index for patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma

4. Prognostic implications of metabolic tumor volume on 18F-FDG PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with extranodal involvement;Son,2015

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How accurately can quantitative imaging methods be ranked without ground truth: an upper bound on no-gold-standard evaluation;Medical Imaging 2024: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment;2024-03-29

2. Need for Objective Task-Based Evaluation of Image Segmentation Algorithms for Quantitative PET: A Study with ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 Multicenter Clinical Trial Data;Journal of Nuclear Medicine;2024-02-15

3. A quality assurance framework for routine monitoring of deep learning cardiac substructure computed tomography segmentation models in radiotherapy;Medical Physics;2023-11-28

4. Carotid atherosclerotic plaque segmentation in multi-weighted MRI using a two-stage neural network: advantages of training with high-resolution imaging and histology;Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine;2023-05-24

5. Joint EANM/SNMMI guideline on radiomics in nuclear medicine;European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging;2022-11-03