Abstract
This concurrent mixed-methods study investigates the landscape of flexible learning in graduate education among 41 coursework academic programs at five State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) in the Davao Region, Philippines. Data collection included an online survey with 422 graduate students and interviews with ten graduate program enrollees. The study employed a combination of statistical mean analysis and Colaizzi’s phenomenological data analysis framework for data interpretation. Through the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework, this research indicates high ratings for the three essential dimensions of CoI Theory – teaching, social, and cognitive presence, reflecting a significant level of satisfaction with flexible learning in the graduate education programs offered by State Universities in the Davao Region. Guided by Schlossberg’s Transition (ST) Theory, this study uncovers promising opportunities associated with flexible learning. Graduate students are presented with the prospects of selfdirected learning, financial and time savings, enhancement of digital skills, multitasking abilities, and the cultivation of crucial soft skills. However, flexible learning is not exempt from limitations, including challenges on unreliable internet connectivity, power interruptions, electronic device-related risks, financial stress, and balancing multiple work and academic responsibilities. To surmount these challenges, graduate students employ various coping strategies such as effective time management, maintaining a positive outlook, and seeking support from family, colleagues, classmates, friends, and their institutions. This research contributes to enhancing the sustainability and enrichment of flexible learning in graduate education. It strongly advocates for a comprehensive analysis of a multifaceted framework, alignment of flexible learning with graduate students’ preferences, and a nuanced understanding of the evolving landscape of flexible learning in graduate education.
Publisher
Western Philippines University
Reference82 articles.
1. Akyol Z, Arbaugh JB, Cleveland-Innes M, Garrison DR, Ice P, Richardson JC and Swan K. 2009. A response to the review of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of distance education, 23(2): 123-135.
2. Al-Mawee W, Kwayu KM and Gharaiber T. 2021. Student's perspective on distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of Western Michigan University, United States. International Journal of Educational Research,2(100080): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.1000800
3. Al Rashidi SH and Alhumaidan H. 2017. Computer vision syndrome prevalence, knowledge and associated factors among Saudi Arabia University Students: Is it a serious problem? International journal of health sciences, 11(5): 17.
4. Arbaugh JB, Cleveland-Innes M, Diaz SR, Garrison DR, Ice P, Richardson JC and Swan KP. 2008. Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4): 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
5. Auld S. 2019. Time management skills that improve student learning. Australian Christian College. https://www.acc.edu.au/blog/time-management-skills-student-learning/. Accessed on 14 March 2023.