Abstract
In this study, the water quality of four coastal areas in Puerto Princesa Bay, with and without informal settlers, were compared in terms of the phytoplankton composition and density, fecal coliform and physicochemical parameters during a 12-month sampling period. Microscopic examination and identification using phytoplankton monographs showed five harmful algal blooms (HABs) genera (Alexandrium, Dinophysis, Nitzschia, Pseudo-nitzschia, and Pyrodinium) with Dinophysis spp. as the most abundant in coastal areas with informal settlers and Pseudo-nitzschia spp. in areas without informal settlers. Eight phytoplankton genera (Coscinodiscus, Proboscia, Rhizosolenia, Skeletonema, Ceratium, Prorocentrum, Protoperidinium, and Oscillatoria) reported to have caused algal blooms were also observed with Coscinodiscus spp. as the most abundant in both groups of coastal areas. Multiple-tube fermentation technique showed fecal coliform count ranging from 4 to >1600 most probable number (MPN)/100 ml in the coastal areas with informal settlers and from <1.8 to 295 MPN/100 ml in areas without informal settlers. Multiprobe measurements showed that both groups of coastal areas have similar physicochemical characteristics with only the dissolved oxygen failing to meet the Philippine standards for class SB waters. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in water quality between the coastal areas with and without informal settlers in terms of fecal coliform and the density of four phytoplankton genera (Pseudo-nitzschia, Skeletonema, Alexandrium and Ceratium). However, there is no significant difference in terms of the physicochemical parameters. Regression analysis indicates that the presence of informal settlers could affect water quality in terms of fecal coliform and the five phytoplankton genera (Coscinodiscus, Pseudo-nitzschia, Skeletonema, Alexandrium and Ceratium).
Publisher
Western Philippines University
Reference39 articles.
1. Akpor OB and Munchie M. 2011. Environmental and public health implications of wastewater quality. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(13): 2379-2387. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.1797
2. Al-Kandari M, Al-Yamani FY and Al-Rifaie K. 2009. Marine Phytoplankton Atlas of Kuwait's Waters. Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Safat. Kuwait. 351pp.
3. AMSAT (Australian Marine Science and Technology Ltd). 2008. ASEAN Marine Water Quality: Management Guidelines and Monitoring Manual. https://environment.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/ASEAN-MarineWater QualityManagementGuidelinesandMonitoringManual.pdf. Accessed on 20 July 2020.
4. Band-Schmidt CJ, Durán-Riveroll LM, Bustillos-Guzmán JJ, Leyva-Valencia I, López-Cortés DJ, Núñez-Vázquez EJ, Hernández-Sandoval FE and Ramírez-Rodríguez DV. 2019. Paralytic Toxin Producing Dinoflagellates in Latin America: Ecology and Physiology. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6(42): 1-39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00042
5. Borja VM, Furio EF, Gatdula NC and Iwataki M. 2019. Occurrence of harmful algal blooms caused by various phytoplankton species in the last three decades in Manila Bay, Philippines. Philippine Journal of Natural Sciences, 24: 80-90.