The impact of the stratification by degree of clinical severity and abandonment risk of tuberculosis treatment

Author:

Daibert de Navarro1,2 Pedro1ORCID,Amaral Haddad3 João Paulo2ORCID,Veiga Costa Rabelo1 Juliana3ORCID,Hermínia de Lima e Silva4 Claudia4ORCID,Neves de Almeida2,5 Isabela5ORCID,da Silva Carvalho6 Wânia6ORCID,Spíndola de Miranda2 Silvana7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1. Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, Prefeitura de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil. 2. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.

2. 3. Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.

3. 1. Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, Prefeitura de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.

4. 4. Secretaria de Estado de Saúde de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.

5. 2. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil. 5. Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto (MG) Brasil.

6. 6. Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais,

7. 2. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the impact of the instrument of the "Stratification by Degree of Clinical Severity and Abandonment Risk of Tuberculosis Treatment" (SRTB) on the tuberculosis outcome. Methods: This study was a pragmatic clinical trial involving patients with a confirmed diagnosis of tuberculosis treated at one of the 152 primary health care units in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, between May of 2016 and April of 2017. Cluster areas for tuberculosis were identified, and the units and their respective patients were divided into intervention (use of SRTB) and nonintervention groups. Results: The total sample comprised 432 participants, 223 and 209 of whom being allocated to the nonintervention and intervention groups, respectively. The risk of treatment abandonment in the nonintervention group was significantly higher than was that in the intervention group (OR = 15.010; p < 0.001), regardless of the number of risk factors identified. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a hazard ratio of 0.0753 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The SRTB instrument was effective in reducing abandonment of tuberculosis treatment, regardless of the number of risk factors for that. This instrument is rapid and easy to use, and can be adapted to different realities. Its application showed characteristics predisposing to a non-adherence to the treatment and established bases to mitigate its impact.

Publisher

Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia

Reference35 articles.

1. 1. World Health Organization [homepage on the Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; c2015 [cited 2020 Dec 2]. Implementing the End TB strategy: The Essentials. [Adobe Acrobat document, 130p.]. Available from: https://www.who.int/tb/publications/2015/end_tb_essential.pdf

2. 2. World Health Organization [homepage on the Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization [cited 2020 Dec 01]. Global tuberculosis report 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-report-2019

3. 3. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Vigilância Epidemiológica. Brasil Livre da Tuberculose: evolução dos cenários epidemiológicos e operacionais da doença. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2019.

4. 4. World Health Organization [homepage on the Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization [cited 2020 Dec 1]. Guidelines for treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis and patient care (2017 update). Available from: https://www.who.int/tb/publications/2017/dstb_guidance_2017/en/

5. 5. Nahid P, Dorman SE, Alipanah N, Barry PM, Brozek JL, Cattamanchi A, et al. Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(7):e147-e195. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw376

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3