Cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the PROactive Physical Activity in COPD–clinical visit instrument for individuals with COPD

Author:

Vinicius Santana1 André1ORCID,Daiane Fontana1 Andrea1ORCID,Cristina de Almeida1 Rafaela1ORCID,Cruz Mantoani1 Leandro1ORCID,Augusto Camillo1,2 Carlos2ORCID,Couto Furlanetto1,2 Karina2ORCID,Rodrigues3,4 Fátima3ORCID,Cruz5 Joana4ORCID,Marques6 Alda5ORCID,Jácome7,8 Cristina6ORCID,Demeyer9 Heleen7ORCID,Dobbels10 Fabienne8ORCID,Garcia-Aymerich11,12,13 Judith9ORCID,Troosters9 Thierry7ORCID,Aparecida Hernandes1 Nidia1ORCID,Pitta1 Fabio1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1. Laboratório de Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Pulmonar – LFIP – Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Estadual de Londrina – UEL – Londrina (PR) Brasil.

2. 1. Laboratório de Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Pulmonar – LFIP – Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Estadual de Londrina – UEL – Londrina (PR) Brasil. 2. Centro de Pesquisas em Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Pitágoras/Universidade Norte do Paraná – UNOPAR – Londrina (PR) Brasil.

3. 3. Instituto de Saúde Ambiental, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal. 4. Unidade de Reabilitação Respiratória, Hospital Pulido Valente, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.

4. 5. Center for Innovative Care and Health Technology – ciTechCare – Escola Superior de Saúde – ESSLEI – Politécnico de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.

5. 6. Laboratório de Investigação e Reabilitação Respiratória – Lab3R – Escola Superior de Saúde e Instituto de Biomedicina – ESSUA/iBiMED – Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.

6. 7. Departamento de Medicina da Comunidade, Informação e Decisão em Saúde – MEDCIDS – Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. 8. Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde – CINTESIS – Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

7. 9. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

8. 10. Academic Center for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

9. 11. Instituto de Salud Global – ISGlobal – Barcelona, España. 12. Universitat Pompeu Fabra – UPF – Barcelona, España. 13. Centro de Investigación Biomedica En Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública – CIBERESP – Barcelona, España.

Abstract

Objective: To adapt the PROactive Physical Activity in COPD-clinical visit (C-PPAC) instrument to the cultural setting in Brazil and to determine the criterion validity, test-retest reliability agreement, and internal consistency of this version. Methods: A protocol for cultural adaptation and validation was provided by the authors of the original instrument and, together with another guideline, was applied in a Portuguese-language version developed by a partner research group from Portugal. The adapted Brazilian Portuguese version was then cross-sectionally administered twice within a seven-day interval to 30 individuals with COPD (57% were men; mean age was 69 ± 6 years; and mean FEV1 was 53 ± 18% of predicted) to evaluate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Participants also completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the modified Medical Research Council scale, the COPD Assessment Test, and Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire to evaluate criterion validity. Results: The C-PPAC instrument showed good internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability: "amount" domain = 0.87 (95% CI, 0.73-0.94) and "difficulty" domain = 0.90 (95% CI, 0.76-0.96). Bland & Altman plots, together with high Lin's concordance correlation coefficients, reinforced that agreement. Criterion validity showed moderate-to-strong correlations of the C-PPAC with all of the other instruments evaluated, especially with the IPAQ (rho = -0.63). Conclusions: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the C-PPAC is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating the experience of Brazilian individuals with COPD with their physical activity in daily life.

Publisher

Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3