The dialogic approach. An effective model for mental health services.

Author:

Ferrari Gianmarco1ORCID,Panariello Fabio2ORCID,De Ronchi Diana3ORCID,Sacchetti Cleta3ORCID,Atti Anna Rita3ORCID,Scudellari Paolo3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy;

2. Department Mental Health, Bologna, Italy;

3. Department Mental Health, Professor at Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy;

Abstract

Background: The quality and effectiveness of therapeutic rehabilitative interventions represent a landmark in the field of mental health. The respect of human rights is strictly linked to health in general, and these two aspects depend on how mental health services guarantee the treatment pathway. Methods: The focus of this study is on the international success of Open Dialogue (OD), once designed for those affected by schizophrenia, since it questions the traditional structure of mental health services. From the study of theoretical principles and the scientific evidences of the benefits of dialogic approach on Services, the core of this contribution consists of how much dialogue can be found inside Services themselves. The field of work was characterised by the operators of two MHCs: Modena Polo Est and Pavullo. The inquiry focused on operators’ behaviours and dispositions towards OD, regardless of the occupation of the workers, but selecting those with direct experience of Open Dialogue. Results: Results highlight that dialogic approach is, in most cases, already adopted by operators, and that it positively affects their dispositions. Conclusion: Despite arduous to undertake, it can be inferred that tolerating uncertainty in its practical application and the reject of a medical-centred approach are extremely necessary. Indeed, not only are they coherent with the dialogic approach, but they also bring improvement aside from the selected approach.

Publisher

Ordine TSRM PSTRP di Napoli, Avellino, Benevento

Subject

Earth-Surface Processes

Reference16 articles.

1. Aaltonen, J., Seikkula, J., Alakare, B., Haarakangas, K., Keranen, J., & Sutela, M., 1997. Western Lapland project: A comprehensive family and network centered community psychiatric project. ISPS, p.124.

2. Bachtin M, 1972. Problemy poètiki Dostoevskogo, Chudožestvennaja literatura, Moskva.

3. Bergström T, Seikkula J, Alakare B, Mäki P, Köngäs-Saviaro P, Taskila J.J, Tolvanen A, Aaltonen J, 2018. The family-oriented open dialogue approach in the treatment of first-episode psychosis: Nineteen–year outcomes.

4. Bedregal, L. E., O’Connell, M., & Davidson, L. (2006). The Recovery Knowledge Inventory: Assessment of Mental Health Staff Knowledge and Attitudes about Recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 30(2), 96–103.

5. British Psychological Society, 2017. Understanding psychosis and schizophrenia.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3