The associations between rumination, interpretation bias and interpretation flexibility-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The associations between rumination, interpretation bias and interpretation flexibility

Published:2024-08-31 Issue:1 Volume:22 Page:1-18
ISSN:1348-7264
Container-title:The Japanese Journal of Cognitive Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:NINCHISHINRIGAKUKENKYU

Author:

Nebashi Tae¹,Matsumoto Noboru²

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Social Well-Being Studies, Hosei University

2. Faculty of Arts, Shinshu University

Publisher

The Japanese Society for Cognitive Psychology

Link

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jcogpsy/22/1/22_2310/_pdf

Reference38 articles.

1. Altamirano, L. J., Miyake, A., & Whitmer, A. J. （2010）. When Mental Inflexibility Facilitates Executive Control: Beneficial Side Effects of Ruminative Tendencies on Goal Maintenance. Psychological Science, 21（10）, 1377–1382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610381505

2. Amin, N., Foa, E. B., & Coles, M. E. （1998）. Negative interpretation bias in social phobia. Behavior Research and Therapy, 36, 945–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00060-6

3. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. （1996）. Manual for Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX. Psychological Corporation.（小嶋雅代・古川壽亮（訳）（2003）．日本語版BDI-II：ベック抑うつ質問票手引き　日本文化科）

4. Bronstein, M. V., & Cannon, T. D. （2017）. Bias Against Disconfirmatory Evidence in a large Nonclinical Sample: Associations with Schizotypy and Delusional Beliefs. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 8（3）, 288–302. https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.057516

5. Bronstein, M. V., & Cannon, T. D. （2018）. Measuring bias against disconfirmatory evidence: An evaluation of BADE task scoring methods and the case for a novel method. Psychiatry Research, 261, 535–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.007