Affiliation:
1. Ordu Ünitversitesi
2. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ
3. SAKARYA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ
4. IĞDIR ÜNİVERSİTESİ
5. BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the research was to determine how collection time, IBA, and putrescine treatments affected the rooting potential of the Foşa hazelnut cultivar (Corylus avellana L.).
Material and Methods: Cuttings were taken from 1-year-old root suckers of Foşa hazelnut cultivar on 4 different dates (June 15, July 10, August 4 and August 28; in 2021 year). 3 different treatments [Control, IBA (2000 ppm) and IBA+putrescine (2000 ppm+1600 ppm)] were performed to the prepared cuttings. Rooting, callusing, survived cutting ratio, dead cutting ratio, root number, root length, rooting level, number of cutting with buds, number of cutting with shoot, and number of cutting with leaves properties were investigated in cuttings removed from the rooting medium.
Results: The collection time and treatments had a significant effect on the rooting ability of Foşa hazelnut cuttings. Depending on the collection time and treatments interaction, the callusing ranged from 1.7 (in IBA+putrescine treatment in the June 15) to 96.7% (in IBA treatment in the July 10). Rooting was determined between 0 (in control in the August 3, in control and IBA+putrescine treatments in the August 28) and 26.7% (in IBA treatment in the July 10). The root number was determined from 0 (in control in the August 3, in control and IBA+putrescine treatments in the August 28) to 13.1 (in IBA treatment in the July 10). Root length was measured between 0 (in control in the August 3, in control and IBA+putrescine treatments in the August 28) and 7.4 cm (in IBA treatment in the July 10). The best rooting scale was determined in (2.5) cuttings collected in July 10 and treated with IBA. It was followed by (2.3) cuttings treated IBA collected in June 15.
Conclusion: It was determined that the rooting ability of IBA-treated semi-hardwood cuttings collected in the early period from Foşa hazelnut cultivar was higher.
Reference31 articles.
1. Acı, F., & Beyhan, N. (2018). Fındığın tepe daldırması yöntemi ile çoğaltılması. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.365185
2. Ates Demirel, B. (2023). Çakıldak fındık çeşidinin Türk fındığı (Corylus colurna L.) anacı üzerinde sürgün ve durgun dönemde aşıyla çoğaltılması. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ordu Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ordu.
3. Avcı, H. İ. (2023). Çelik alma zamanı, IBA ve putresin uygulamalarının Tombul fındık çeşidinde köklenme üzerine etkisi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ordu Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ordu.
4. Bacchetta, L., Aramini, M., Bernardini, C., & Rugini, E. (2008). In vitro propagation of traditional Italian hazelnut cultivars as a tool for the valorization and conservation of local genetic resources. HortScience, 43(2), 562-566.
https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.43.2.562
5. Balta, F. (1989). Dinlenme döneminde alınan fındık çeliklerinin köklendirilmesi üzerine bir araştırma. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Samsun.