British Edition of the Monroe Doctrine versus ‘Com- munist Militarism’: Collisions between the USSR and the UK in Eastern Countries in the mid-1920s-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

British Edition of the Monroe Doctrine versus ‘Com- munist Militarism’: Collisions between the USSR and the UK in Eastern Countries in the mid-1920s

Published:2023-12-04 Issue:3 Volume:15 Page:125-159
ISSN:2076-7404
Container-title:Lomonosov World Politics Journal
language:
Short-container-title:jour

Author:

Sergeev E. Yu.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences; Russian State University for the Humanities

Abstract

The new US foreign policy concept in the Western hemisphere introduced by the American President J. Monroe in December 1823 has become a milestone both in the country’s history and in the theory and practice of international relations in general. For Great Britain, the principles of the Monroe Doctrine acquired new relevance after the end of the First World War. The prospect of unfettered Bolshevik expansion into British colonies and dependent territories in Asia and Africa became a matter of particular concern for the UK ruling circles. It was this threat that forced the military and political elites of Great Britain to turn to the experience of their overseas counterparts and develop a set of measures that can be described as the British edition of the Monroe Doctrine. These measures were directed right against the Bolsheviks’ attempts to revolutionize the national liberation movement and to use it to undermine the ‘colonial rear’ of the imperialist powers. British decision-makers interpreted these attempts as a Bolsheviks’ endeavor to revive the foreign policy practices of the Russian Empire and denoted them as ‘communist militarism’. It is through the lens of the collision of the British edition of the Monroe Doctrine and the concept of ‘communist militarism’ that this study examines the dynamics of the Soviet-British confrontation in Central Asia in the mid-1920s. Special attention is paid to the struggle that took place between the two countries in Iran (Persia), Afghanistan, northwest India, Xinjiang and Tibet. This competition for influence over local rulers took a variety of forms: from information and propaganda campaigns to rivalry in the field of infrastructure and logistics projects. At the same time, it was accompanied by a constant clash of interests of various factions within the USSR and Great Britain, which prevented them from pursuing a coherent policy in the region. Together, these circumstances endowed the Soviet-British rivalry in Central Asia in the 1920s with a number of unique features that does not allow it to be interpreted as just yet another round of the ‘Great Game’.

Publisher

Lomonosov Moscow State University, School of World Politics

Subject

General Engineering

Reference47 articles.

1. Abdullaev K.N. 2009. Ot Sin’tszyana do Khorasana. Iz istorii sredneaziatskoi emigratsii XX veka [From Xinjiang to Khorasan. From the history of Central Asian emigration of the 20th century]. Dushanbe, Irfon Publ. (In Russ.)

2. Airapetov O.R. 2020. Vneshnyaya politika Sovetskoi Rossii i SSSR v 1920–1939 godakh i istoki Vtoroi mirovoi voiny [Foreign policy of Soviet Russia and the USSR in 1920–1939 and the origins of the Second World War]. Moscow, Rodina Publ. (In Russ.)

3. Andreev A.I. 2006. Tibet v politike tsarskoi, sovetskoi i postsovetskoi Rossii [Tibet in the politics of Tsarist, Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia]. Saint-Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Izdatel’stvo A. Terent’eva ‘Nartang’ Publ. (In Russ.)

4. Barmin V.A. 1999. Sovetskii Soyuz i Sin’tszyan 1918–1941 gg. Regional’nyi faktor vo vneshnei politike Sovetskogo Soyuza [The Soviet Union and Xinjiang, 1918–1941. Regional factor in the foreign policy of the Soviet Union]. Barnaul, Izdatel’stvo BGPU Publ. (In Russ.)

5. Vertinskii A.V. 1986. Komissiya Saimona i bor’ba v politicheskikh krugakh Velikobritanii vokrug indiiskoi konstitutsionnoi reformy (1927–1930 gg.) [The Simon commission and the struggle in the political circles of Great Britain over the Indian constitutional reform (1927–1930)]. In: Grigortsevich S.S. (ed.). Iz istorii burzhuaznoi diplomatii i mezhimperialisticheskikh protivorechii v pervoi polovine XX v. [From the history of bourgeois diplomacy and inter-imperialist contradictions in the first half of the twentieth century]. Tomsk, Izdatel’stvo Tomskogo universiteta Publ., pp. 57–73. (In Russ.)