Looking back, moving forward: Towards improving local governments' performance in Ghana

Author:

Zakaria Hamza Bukari

Abstract

This paper, based on a desk study, adopts a path-dependent perspective to explore how local government authorities in Ghana have attempted to institutionalise performance management at the organisational level. It questions the existing performance diagnostic framework that is used to assess local government authorities by arguing that any attempt to consolidate the prevailing ‘performance assessment regime’ ought to re-examine previous government initiatives that had in-built mechanisms for assessing local government performance. The prevailing system, despite its attempt to empower local authorities further promotes central government manipulation of local government administration. The paper concludes that performance assessment of local governments in Ghana will remain ineffective until local government councils genuinely serve local communities and their citizens by achieving goals and objectives that are consistent with the needs and aspirations of the latter rather than relying on annual performance assessments designed to ignore the opinions of citizens.

Publisher

University of Technology, Sydney (UTS)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. Alam, M. & Koranteng, R. (2011). Decentralisation in Ghana: Papers presented at workshops held at GIMPA, Ghana from 2007-2010. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

2. An unbreakable path? A comparative study of decentralization and local government development trajectories in Ghana and Uganda

3. Ayee, J. & Dickovick, J. T. (2010). Comparative Assessment of Decentralization in Africa: Ghana Desk Study. Report prepared for the United States Agency for International Development. Contract: DFD-I-00-04-00227--00. United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

4. THE MEASUREMENT OF DECENTRALIZATION: THE GHANAIAN EXPERIENCE, 1988-92

5. The Adjustment of Central Bodies to Decentralization: The Case of the Ghanaian Bureaucracy

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3