Genetic Alterations in Glioblastoma and Their Clinical Implications – A Comprehensive Review
-
Published:2023-10-01
Issue:2
Volume:3
Page:38-46
-
ISSN:2784-0131
-
Container-title:Journal of Medical and Radiation Oncology
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:JMRO
Author:
Hanu Alexandra, ,Eremia Gentiana Ioana,Dina Marianne Elena,Serban Andrei,Tanase Georgiana,Neagu Alexandra, , , , , , ,
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. In recent years, molecular research has provided valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms of GBM, uncovering key molecular alterations and signaling pathways that drive tumor development and progression. Driver mutations play a critical role in the pathogenesis of glioblastoma (GBM), influencing tumor initiation, growth, and therapeutic response. Among the key driver mutations identified in GBM, the prominent example is the mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. Dysregulated signaling pathways, including the PI3K/Akt/mTOR, the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK, and the NOTCH pathway play a critical role in cell proliferation, survival, and invasion in GBM. Epigenetic modifications contribute to tumor initiation, repression of the tumor suppressor genes, and therapy resistance. Global DNA hypomethylation, site-specific hypermethylation, histone deacetylase, microRNAs (miRNAs), and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are the most common epigenetic modifications. Immune checkpoints, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) are upregulated, leading to T-cell exhaustion and impaired antitumor immune responses. The molecular classification systems have provided a more refined understanding of GBM biology, have important implications for personalized treatment strategies, play a role in guiding clinical trials designed to specifically target and evaluate novel therapies in patients with specific molecular subtypes, and hold promise for predicting treatment response. The identification of molecular subtypes can be associated with different treatment decisions.
Publisher
Asociatia Societatea Transdisciplinara de Oncologie Personalizata Pentru Combaterea Cancerului - Stop Cancer
Reference45 articles.
1. "1.Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Truitt G, Boscia A, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. CBTRUS Statistical Report: PrimaryBrain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2011-2015. Neuro-Oncol. 2018 Oct 2. 2.Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, Read W, Steinberg DM, Lhermitte B, et al. Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields PlusMaintenance Temozolomide vs Maintenance Temozolomide Alone on Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma: ARandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2306. 3. 3.Brennan CW, Verhaak RGW, McKenna A, Campos B, Noushmehr H, Salama SR, et al. The Somatic GenomicLandscape of Glioblastoma. Cell. 2013 Oct;155(2):462-77.Stupp, R., Taillibert, S., Kanner, A., Read, W., Steinberg, D.M., Lhermitte, B., ... (et al.). (2017). Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Maintenance Temozolomide vs Maintenance 4. 4.Ohgaki H, Kleihues P. Genetic Pathways to Primary and Secondary Glioblastoma. Am J Pathol. 2007May;170(5):1445-53. 5. 5.Noushmehr H, Weisenberger DJ, Diefes K, Phillips HS, Pujara K, Berman BP, et al. Identification of a CpG IslandMethylator Phenotype that Defines a Distinct Subgroup of Glioma. Cancer Cell. 2010 May;17(5):510-22.
|
|