Author:
Mercaldo Francesco,Brunese Luca,Santone Antonella,Martinelli Fabio,Cesarelli Mario
Abstract
In the current realm of biomedical image classification, the predominant choice remains deep learning networks, particularly convolutional neural network (CNN) models. However, deep learning suffers from a notable drawback in terms of its high training cost, mainly due to intricate data models. A recent alternative, known as the Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), has emerged as a promising solution. Empirical investigations have indicated that ELM can offer satisfactory predictive performance for a wide array of classification tasks, while significantly reducing training costs when compared to deep learning networks trained using back propagation.This research paper introduces a methodology designed to evaluate the suitability of employing the Extreme Learning Machine for biomedical classification tasks. Our study encompasses binary and multiclass classification across four distinct scenarios, involving the analysis of biomedical images obtained from both dermatoscopes and blood cell microscopes. The findings underscore the effectiveness of the Extreme Learning Machine, showcasing its successful utilization in the classification of biomedical images.
Publisher
European Alliance for Innovation n.o.
Reference38 articles.
1. RUMELHART, D.E., HINTON, G.E. and WILLIAMS, R.J. (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. nature 323(6088): 533–536.
2. HAGAN, M.T. and MENHAJ, M.B. (1994) Training feedforward networks with the marquardt algorithm. IEEE transactions on Neural Networks 5(6): 989–993.
3. CHEN, S., COWAN, C. and GRANT, P. (1991) Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial. IEEE Transactions on neural networks 2(2): 303.
4. URGEN BRANKE, J. (1995) Evolutionary algorithms for neural network design and training. In Proceedings of the 1st Nordic Workshop on Genetic Algorithms and its Applictions (Citeseer).
5. HUANG, G., HUANG, G.B., SONG, S. and YOU, K. (2015) Trends in extreme learning machines: A review. Neural Networks 61: 32–48.