Affiliation:
1. Department of Building Environment and Energy Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China
Abstract
Despite the proven benefits of solar bifacial photovoltaic (BPV) over monofacial PV (MPV) systems, the feasibility of the technology in subtropical climate regions has not been evaluated. Thus, this study provides a comprehensive energy performance evaluation of BPV in Hong Kong using numerical simulation and on-site experimental validation. Three types of solar PV modules, i.e. monofacial PV, framed BPV and frameless BPV, are studied experimentally under different tilt angles, mounting heights and slope orientations. The obtained field measurements and simulation results show that the average bifacial gain (BG) of a BPV system can reach 7.9% and 11.6% when facing south, and up to 167% when facing east. Furthermore, it was observed that an increase in tilt angle also influences the BG performance, and the annual electricity yield can be maximised by increasing the ground albedo through white painting on the roof surface. Finally, the obtained results in this study validate previous studies’ assertion that BPV is a viable option over MPV and provides a starting point for the adoption of BPV in subtropical climate regions, especially in Hong Kong.
Publisher
The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers
Reference27 articles.
1. Araki I, Tatsunokuchi M, Nakahara H and Tomita T (2009). Bifacial PV system in Aichi Airport-site Demonstrative Research Plant for New Energy Power Generation, Solar energy materials and solar cells, 93(6), pp.911–916.
2. Baloch A, Hammat S, Figgis B, Alharbi F and Tabet N (2020). In-field characterization of key performance parameters for bifacial photovoltaic installation in a desert climate. Renewable energy, 159, pp.50–63.
3. Regen Power (2021). Bifacial solar panels technology - emergence & evolution. Available at: . [Accessed on 15 October 2021].
4. Bordin N, Karsenty A, Drori A and Kreinin L (2011). Experimental analysis of the increases in energy generation of bifacial over monofacial PV modules. In Proceedings of the 26th European photovoltaic solar energy conference, pp. 3140–43.
5. Castillo AJ and Hauser P (2016). Multi-Variable Bifacial Photovoltaic Module Test Results and Best-Fit Annual Bifacial Energy Yield Model. IEEE Access, 4, 498-506.