Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Abstract
In this paper, I argue that while scientific knowledge is both an intrinsic and an instrumental good, good science does not consist in maximizing such knowledge without regard to anything else. Rather, like the good life, or the good society, good science requires a careful weighing and balancing of knowledge as a value and the values of a free society, including the rule of law, the inviolability of human rights, and the constraints of social justice. Science is, and should be, committed to knowledge and truth, but a science committed only to knowledge and truth is a hostage to fortune, and may find itself, at every turn, allied with inhumanity and injustice, ultimately undermining, thereby, the very possibility of a free society and of free inquiry along with it. Various historical cases of morally tainted scientific knowledge are brought up and discussed along these lines.
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference15 articles.
1. Alexander, L. 1946. The treatment of shock from prolonged exposure to cold especially in water. Washington DC, Office of Publication Board, Dept. of Commerce, 1946. Report #250.
2. Angell, M. 2009. Drug companies and doctors: a story of corruption. NY Review of Books 56: 1, Jan 15, 2009.
3. Angell, M. 1990. The Nazi hypothermia experiments and unethical research today. N. Engl. J. Med. 322: 1462-1464.
4. Chomsky, N. 1983. Things no amount of learning can teach, interview by John Gleidman, Omni 6:11, Nov. 1983. http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/198311—.htm http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/198311—.htm
5. Declaration of Helsinki http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献