Pancreatic Body and Tail Cancer: Is Laparoscopic Surgery an Effective Method?

Author:

Gojayev AfigORCID,Celasin HaydarORCID,Cetindag Ozhan,Culcu SerdarORCID,Unal AliORCID,Demirci Salim

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic treatment of pancreas body and tail cancers is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) in pancreas cancer patients. Material & Methods: The data of 108 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer were evaluated. Patients were categorized into two groups by operation method: laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy [LDP; 35 cases] and open distal pancreatectomy [ODP; 73 cases]. Patient characteristics, surgical findings, short- and long-term results were compared. Results: The operation time was significantly shorter in ODP (p<0.001). The blood loss (100 ml [min-max: 50-800]) of the LDP was significantly lower than ODP (200 [min-max: 100-800]) (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of postoperative complications. The median hospital stay (6 [min-max: 4-32]) was found to be significantly higher in ODP (p=0.024). Oncological findings (tumor size; harvested lymph node; metastatic lymph node; perineural invasion; lymphovascular invasion) of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were similar. There was no significant difference in the overall survival rates of the two groups (Log-rank=0.066; p=0.798). Conclusion: Although the preference of LDP in pancreatic cancer patients prolongs the operation time, it reduces hospital stay and blodd loss. Overall complication rates and oncologic outcomes appear to be similar. In conclusion, LDP is a feasible and safe method in pancreatic cancer patients. Keywords: laparoscopy, pancreatic neoplasms, pancreas cancer, pancreatectomy, pancreas surgery

Publisher

Medical and Surgical Research Journals Group (MSRJGroup)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3