Time-related changes in canine luteal regulation: in vivo effects of LH on progesterone and prolactin during pregnancy

Abstract

The role of LH in luteal function in pregnant dogs was investigated at two different periods during pregnancy: (i) the transitional period from apparent total independence of the corpus luteum to relative hormonal dependence (days 20-35); and (ii) the period of full hormonal dependence (days 35-40). At both periods, LH neutralization, LH inhibition and LH administration studies were conducted. At both periods LH immunoneutralization had no significant effect on the secretion pattern of progesterone or prolactin. GnRH antagonist treatment (Nal-Glu) decreased plasma LH below the detection limit in all treatment periods. Nal-Glu had no effect on prolactin. When GnRH antagonist osmotic pumps were implanted, a transient decrease in plasma progesterone concentrations occurred on days 21-22 but not during the remaining implantation period. When GnRH antagonist was injected, plasma progesterone temporarily decreased (24 h) after the beginning of treatment starting on day 20, but decreased for 5 days when the treatment started on day 35. When purified pig LH was injected i.v. twice a day for 2 consecutive days either from day 30 or from day 40, plasma progesterone concentrations remained constant during treatment. However, on days 40 and 41, an increase in prolactin was observed. These results indicate that LH immunoneutralization may not impair corpus luteum function. In addition, GnRH antagonist induces dose- and time-dependent effects. Only high doses resulted in a decrease in progesterone, the duration of which increased as pregnancy progressed. Continuous GnRH antagonist administration, even when associated with complete LH inhibition, was not associated with detectable effects on progesterone. Finally, LH administration does not stimulate progesterone but may modify prolactin in the last third of pregnancy. Other studies indicated a corpus luteum prolactin dependency. The present study indicates that, in pregnant bitches, LH may not be necessary to sustain progesterone synthesis but that its role may vary in a time-dependent manner.