Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using collared versus collarless uncemented HA-coated stems: a meta-analysis

Author:

Ait-Si-Selmi Tarik12,Vidalain Jean-Pierre2,Ramos-Pascual Sonia3ORCID,Kuratle Thomas3,Saffarini Mo3,Dejour Edouard3,Bonnin Michel P12

Affiliation:

1. Centre Orthopédique Santy, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay Santé, 55 Avenue Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France

2. Artro Institute, 8, rue du Pont de Thé, Annecy Le Vieux, France

3. ReSurg SA, Rue Saint Jean 22, Nyon, Switzerland

Abstract

Purpose to systematically review comparative studies reporting revision rates, clinical outcomes, or radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using collared versus collarless conventional-length uncemented hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stems. Methods In adherence with PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was performed on Medline, Embase, and Scopus. Comparative clinical studies were eligible if they reported outcomes of collared versus collarless uncemented HA-coated stems for primary THA. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full-texts to determine eligibility; then performed data extraction; and assessed the quality of studies according to Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Results The search returned 972 records, 486 were duplicates, and 479 were excluded after title/abstract/full-text screening. Three further studies were included from the references of eligible studies and from discussions with subject matter experts, resulting in 11 included studies. The JBI checklist indicated six studies scored ≥7 points and four studies ≥4 points. Pooled data revealed collared stems had significantly lower revision rates (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.31–0.64) and subsidence (MD = −1 mm; 95% CI = −1.6–-0.3), but no significant difference in intraoperative complication rates (OR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.67–1.32) in the short term to mid-term. Unpooled data indicated that collared stems provide equivalent survival, equivalent or better outcomes, and equivalent or lower complication rates. Conclusion In comparative studies, collared stems have lower revision rates than collarless stems, as well as equivalent or better clinical and radiographic outcomes. Differences could be due to a protective effect that the collar offers against subsidence, particularly in undersized or misaligned stems. Further studies are warranted to confirm long-term results and better understand differences between registry data and clinical studies.

Publisher

Bioscientifica

Reference64 articles.

1. Ann;Gundersen,2021

2. Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2020 Annual Report,2020

3. Nationa;Ben-Shlomo,2021

4. The effect of size for a hydroxyapatite-coated cementless implant on component revision in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 41,265 stems;Hoskins,2020

5. How does implant survivorship vary with different corail femoral stem variants? Results of 51,212 cases with UP to 30 years of follow-up from the Norwegian arthroplasty Register;Melbye,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3