Artificial intelligence in diagnosing upper limb musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests

Author:

Droppelmann Guillermo123ORCID,Rodríguez Constanza4,Jorquera Carlos5,Feijoo Felipe6

Affiliation:

1. Research Center on Medicine, Exercise, Sport and Health, MEDS Clinic, Santiago, RM, Chile

2. Health Sciences PhD Program, Universidad Católica de Murcia UCAM, Murcia, Spain

3. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

4. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Finis Terrae, Santiago, RM, Chile

5. Facultad de Ciencias, Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, RM, Chile

6. School of Industrial Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile

Abstract

Purpose The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology has revolutionized diagnostics, optimizing precision and decision-making. Specifically in musculoskeletal imaging, AI tools can improve accuracy for upper extremity pathologies. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of AI models in detecting musculoskeletal pathologies of the upper extremity using different imaging modalities. Methods A meta-analysis was conducted, involving searches on MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, Lilacs, and SciELO. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Diagnostic accuracy measures including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR, NLR), area under the curve (AUC), and summary receiver operating characteristic were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity and subgroup analyses were also included. All statistical analyses and plots were performed using the R software package. Results Thirteen models from ten articles were analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity of the AI models to detect musculoskeletal conditions in the upper extremity were 0.926 (95% CI: 0.900; 0.945) and 0.908 (95% CI: 0.810; 0.958). The PLR, NLR, lnDOR, and the AUC estimates were found to be 19.18 (95% CI: 8.90; 29.34), 0.11 (95% CI: 0.18; 0.46), 4.62 (95% CI: 4.02; 5.22) with a (P < 0.001), and 95%, respectively. Conclusion The AI models exhibited strong univariate and bivariate performance in detecting both positive and negative cases within the analyzed dataset of musculoskeletal pathologies in the upper extremity.

Publisher

Bioscientifica

Reference40 articles.

1. The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications;Bohr,2020

2. Multiple instance convolutional neural network with modality-based attention and contextual multi-instance learning pooling layer for effective differentiation between borderline and malignant epithelial ovarian tumors;Jian,2021

3. How does artificial intelligence in radiology improve efficiency and health outcomes?;Van Leeuwen,2022

4. Artificial intelligence in clinical medicine: catalyzing a sustainable global healthcare paradigm;Krishnan,2023

5. Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery exploring its applications, limitations, and future direction introduction: artificial intelligence, time for clear nomenclature;Lisacek-Kiosoglous,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3