The influence of nodule size on clinical efficacy of ethanol ablation and microwave ablation on cystic or predominantly cystic thyroid nodules

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of ethanol ablation (EA) and microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of cystic or predominantly cystic thyroid nodules. Methods Patients with cystic or predominantly cystic thyroid nodules intervened with EA or MWA were retrospectively enrolled and divided into EA group (n  = 30) and MWA group (n  = 31). The volume and volume reduction rate (VRR) of thyroid nodules before ablation, and at 3 and 12 months after ablation were compared between the two groups. The effective rate (ER) and incidence of adverse events in both groups were recorded. Results The median VRR and ER at 3 months after ablation were significantly higher in EA group than in MWA group (81.30% vs 75.76%, P = 0.011; 76.67% (23/30) vs 51.61% (16/31), P = 0.040), while no significant difference was detected at 12 months (93.39% vs 88.78%, P = 0.141; 86.67% (26/30) vs 87.10% (27/31), P = 0.960). The median VRR of small nodules in EA group was significantly higher than that in MWA group (81.30% vs 71.18%, P = 0.006; 93.40% vs 83.14%, P = 0.032). There was no significant difference of median VRR in medium nodules at final follow-up between MWA and EA group (93.01% vs 89.68%, P = 0.482). Serious adverse events were not reported in both groups. Conclusion EA and MWA are both effective and safe in the treatment of cystic or predominantly cystic thyroid nodules. EA is more cost-effective and effective than MWA for small nodules, but it requires more cycles of treatment and may pose a higher risk of postoperative pain compared with MWA.