PROGNOSIS OF THE OUTCOME OF PREGNANCIES IN DIABETICS

Author:

Pedersen Jørgen,Pedersen Lars Mølsted

Abstract

ABSTRACT In order to improve the possibilities of predicting the outcome of pregnancy in diabetics, we analysed a consecutive series of 304 pregnancies in 263 diabetic women in the Royal Maternity Department B, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, during the 5-year period 1959-1963. The period of supervision and treatment during pregnancy varied greatly. The perinatal mortality in the 306 infants was 17.9%. According to the results of this analysis, patients with a poor prognosis were divided into the following four groups: Pregnant women who developed (1) hyperpyretic pyelitis, (2) pre-coma or severe acidosis, (3) toxaemia, or patients who could be so described, (4) »neglectors« These four groups, and the classification, are designated PBSP (Prognostically Bad Signs during Pregnancy). The mothers of 130 infants belonged to one or more of the four groups of PBSP, and among the infants of these mothers the perinatal mortality was 31.5% as compared with 7.9% in the group of 176 infants without PBSP during pregnancy. The poor prognosis for the pregnancies with PBSP applies to all foetal weight groups. In addition, these pregnancies terminate in premature delivery twice as often as the others. It is demonstrated that from the prognostic point of view, nothing is gained by including hydramnios in PBSP. The risk involved by a PBSP complication to the foetus depends on the White (1949) class in which it occurs. A combination of White's classification of pregnant diabetics with regard to foetal prognosis used together with the present classification improves the possibility of predicting the foetal prognosis in a series of pregnant diabetics which is mixed as regards the length of treatment during pregnancy.

Publisher

Bioscientifica

Subject

Endocrinology,General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3