Algorithm vs clinical experience: controlled ovarian stimulations with follitropin delta and individualised doses of follitropin alpha/beta

Author:

Gazzo Irene12ORCID,Bovis Francesca3,Colia Denise4,Sozzi Fausta5,Costa Mauro4,Anserini Paola5,Massarotti Claudia12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI Department), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy

2. IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy

3. Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy

4. Reproductive Medicine Unit, Ospedale Evangelico Internazionale, Genova, Italy

5. Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy

Abstract

In the registration trials, follitropin delta was compared with a fixed dose of 150 UI of follitropin alpha/beta, finding higher chances to reach a target response of 8–14 oocytes compared to controls. For this reason, follitropin delta is marketed as particularly useful in expected hyper-responder patients. The main outcome of this study is to report if comparable results are reached in a real-life scenario with follitropin alpha/beta doses chosen by the physician, based on patients’ characteristics. This is a retrospective study performed in two public fertility centres. All first cycles from January 2020 to June 2022 with either follitropin delta (cases) or alpha/beta (controls) in patients with anti-Müllerian hormone >2.5 ng/mL were compared by an inverse probability weighting approach based on propensity score. The follitropin total dose was higher in controls (1179.06 ± 344.93 vs 1668.67 ± 555.22 IU, P < 0.001). The target response of 8–14 oocytes was reached by 40.2% of cases and 40.7% of controls (odds ratio (OR): 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65–1.53, P = 0.98). Fewer than 8 oocytes were collected in 24.1% of cases and 22% of controls (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.71–1.69, P = 0.67); more than 14 oocytes in 35.7% of cases and 37.3% of controls (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.54–1.28, P = 0.40). Our experience did not find worse results in term of proportion of patients who reached the target response with an algorithm-chosen dose of follitropin delta compared to a personalised starting dose of follitropin alpha/beta, with follitropin delta having the advantage of objectivity. However, larger numbers are needed to confirm these results. Lay summary The starting dose of the drugs used to stimulate the ovaries in IVF (gonadotropins) is usually decided by the doctor, using their clinical experience and expertise and tailored to the individual patient. Recently one type of stimulating drug (follitropin delta) was marketed with an algorithm for deciding the starting dose based on the patient’s anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and weight. In the initial trials, it was compared with a fixed dose of standard follitropins (alpha/beta), and it was found to reduce the likelihood of an excessive response in patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. We report on these results, in terms of number of eggs obtained, in patients with an expected high ovarian response, compared to doses of standard follitropins that were not fixed, but personalised, to see if this did not make a difference. We found similar results in the two groups, suggesting that using the algorithm to decide the dose of follitropin delta does not work less well than a personalised starting dose of follitropin alpha/beta, but has the advantage of being objective.

Publisher

Bioscientifica

Reference24 articles.

1. Ovarian response to recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone: a randomized, antiMüllerian hormone-stratified, dose-response trial in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection;Arce,2014

2. Establishing the follitropin delta dose that provides a comparable ovarian response to 150 IU/day follitropin alfa;Arce,2020

3. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies;Austin,2015

4. An eight centre, retrospective, clinical practice data analysis of algorithm-based treatment with follitropin delta;Bachmann,2022

5. Prospective multicenter non-interventional real-world study to assess the patterns of use, effectiveness and safety of follitropin delta in routine clinical practice (the PROFILE study);Blockeel,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3