Systematic review of patient-specific pre-operative predictors of pain improvement to endometriosis surgery

Author:

Ball Elizabeth12,Karavadra Babu3,Kremer-Yeatman Bethany Jade4,Mustard Connor5,Lee Kim May5,Bhogal Sharandeep6,Dodds Julie6,Horne Andrew W7,Allotey John8,Rivas Carol9

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

2. 2Women’s Health Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

3. 3Department of Gynecology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK

4. 4Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK

5. 5Barts and the London Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

6. 6Women’s Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

7. 7MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, UK

8. 8Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research and Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

9. 9UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK

Abstract

Background Up to 28% of endometriosis patients do not get pain relief from therapeutic laparoscopy but this subgroup is not defined. Objectives To identify any prognostic patient-specific factors (such as but not limited to patients’ type or location of endometriosis, sociodemographics and lifestyle) associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in post-surgical pain response to operative laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Search strategy PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases were searched from inception to 19 May 2020 without language restrictions. Backward and forward citation tracking was used. Selection criteria, data collection and analysis: Cohort studies reporting prognostic factors, along with scores for domains of pain associated with endometriosis before and after surgery, were included. Studies that compared surgeries, or laboratory tests, or outcomes without stratification were excluded. Results were synthesised but variation in study designs and inconsistency of outcome reporting precluded us from doing a meta-analysis. Main results Five studies were included. Quality assessment using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale graded three studies as high, one as moderate and one as having a low risk of bias. Four of five included studies separately reported that a relationship exists between more severe endometriosis and stronger pain relief from laparoscopic surgery. Conclusion Currently, there are few studies of appropriate quality to answer the research question. We recommend future studies report core outcome sets to enable meta-analysis. Lay summary Endometriosis is a painful condition caused by displaced cells from the lining of the womb, causing inflammation and scarring inside the body. It affects 6–10% of women and there is no permanent cure. Medical and laparoscopic surgical treatments are available, but about 28% of patients do not get the hoped-for pain relief after surgery. Currently, there is no way of predicting who gets better and who does not. We systematically searched the world literature to establish who may get better, in order to improve counselling when women choose treatment options. We identified five studies of variable quality showing: More complex disease (in specialist hands) responds better to surgery than less, but more studies needed.

Publisher

Bioscientifica

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3