Interpretation of growth hormone provocative tests: comparison of cut-off values in four European laboratories

Abstract

Andersson A-M, Ørskov H, Ranke MB, Shalet B, Skakkebæk NE. Interpretation of growth hormone provocative tests: comparison of cut-off values in four European laboratories. Eur J Endocrinol 1995;132:340–3. ISSN 0804–4643 To compare interpretations of growth hormone (GH) provocative tests in laboratories using six different GH immunoassays (one enzymeimmunometric assay (EIMA, assay 1), one immunoradiometric assay (IRMA, assay 5), one time-resolved fluorimmunometric assay (TRFIA, assay 3) and three radioimmunoassays (RIAs, assays 2, 4 and 6)), aliquots of peak samples from GH provocative tests were distributed between the four participating laboratories, quantified in the respective immunoassays and interpreted according to the cut-off values for provocative tests defined for each assay method. There was a high degree of relative correlation between the different assays, but absolute GH estimates differed. Assays 2, 4, 5 and 6 yielded almost identical GH levels. Assays 1 and 3 yielded serum GH levels approximately 39% and 70%, respectively, of those of assays 2, 4, 5 and 6. Although the absolute GH level measured in the various assay methods varied, there was good agreement between the interpretation of a given sample among the participating laboratories. This indicates that the differences in estimates of serum GH concentration by different immunoassay systems can be compensated for when cut-off values are defined for each method. Anna-Maria Andersson, Dept. of Growth and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Ward GR5064, 9 Blegdamsvej, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark