Conventional and novel biomarkers of treatment outcome in patients with acromegaly: discordant results after somatostatin analog treatment compared with surgery

Abstract

ContextControl of disease activity in acromegaly is critical, but the biochemical definitions remain controversial.ObjectiveTo compare traditional and novel biomarkers and health status in patients with acromegaly treated with either surgery alone or somatostatin analog (SA).Design and methodsSixty-three patients in long-term remission based on normalized total IGF1 levels after surgery alone (n=36) or SA (n=27) were studied in a cross-sectional manner. The groups were comparable at diagnosis regarding demographic and biochemical variables. Each subject underwent 3 h of serum sampling including a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Health status was measured by two questionnaires: EuroQoL and Acrostudy (Patient-assessed-Acromegaly symptom questionnaire (PASQ)).ResultsTotal and bioactive IGF1 (μg/l) levels were similar (total: 185±10 (SA) versus 171±8 (surgery) (P=0.28); bioactive: 1.9±0.2 vs 1.9±0.1 (P=0.70)). Suppression of total and free GH (μg/l) during OGTT was blunted in the SA group (total GHnadir: 0.59±0.08 (SA) versus 0.34±0.06 (surgery) (P=0.01); free GHnadir: 0.43±0.06 vs 0.19±0.04 (P<0.01)). The insulin response to OGTT was delayed, and the 2-h glucose level was elevated during SA treatment (P=0.02). Disease-specific health status was better in patients after surgery (P=0.02).Conclusionsi) Despite similar and normalized IGF1 levels, SA treatment compared with surgery alone was associated with less suppressed GH levels and less symptom relief; ii) this discordance may be due to specific suppression of hepatic IGF1 production by SA; iii) we suggest that biochemical assessment during SA treatment should include both GH and IGF1.