Effect of Spaced and Massed Learning Approaches on the Performance of Faculty Members in Medical Education

Abstract

Introduction. The effectiveness of spaced and massed strategies can be evaluated by examining how educational experts (faculty members) transfer their learning skills to real-life educational contexts, such as with their undergraduate students in Saudi Arabia. It is necessary to consider the respective benefits of these strategies for faculty members to maintain standards and capabilities, fulfilling their learning and development needs. Aim. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of spaced and massed practice programs for faculty members in transferring their acquired assessment skills to their students. To achieve this goal, we used a mixed methodological approach, integrating both qualitative and quantitative methods into the study design. Methods. This study was carried out at the Faculty of Medicine, King Abdul-Aziz University (KAU), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Focus group discussions were employed for the qualitative approach, while the paired-sample t-test and Chi-square test of independence were used for the quantitative approach. Results. The results of the focus group discussion indicated that participants from both groups preferred the spaced learning approach, considering the busy schedules of medical doctors and students. In terms of cost effectivity, both group participants preferred the massed learning technique. Two (25%) participants from the spaced technique group and five (62.5%) participants from the massed technique group succeeded in applying all parts of the assessment cycle without significant help from other experts. Three (37.5%) participants in the spaced groups agreed that the pathway of applying the standards was confusing and entailed extra work requirements, while five (62.5%) participants in the massed group responded that it increased the feeling of being overwhelmed. Furthermore, the statistical results did not provide a clear indication of which program faculty members should adopt to facilitate their students in a better way. The lack of statistically significant differences between the findings of both programs suggests that the results do not confirm the superiority of spaced or massed practice, as is often assumed in medical education. Conclusions. Both spaced and massed learning strategies were found to be broadly effective in transferring assessment skills, with no significant qualitative and qualitative differences. Their effectiveness depended on the specification of modules.