Abstract
The objective of the research was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Diabetes Distress Scale in patients with type 2 diabetes in Turkey.
Materials and Methods. Our study was conducted between September 2016 and January 2017 and included 170 patients with type 2 diabetes. The Personal Information Form and Diabetes Distress Scale were used as a data collection tool. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0 and SAS package program.
Results. According to the results of the research, Cronbach’s alpha reliability for the total scale was 0.91. The model fit indices for the revised confirmatory factor analysis model failed to meet the criteria for acceptability: the GFI was 0.8185, the CFI was 0.9316, the Bentler - Bonett (1980) NFI was 0.9005, and the RMSEA was 0.1067. In our study, exploratory factor analysis provided support for the three-factor model: [I] emotional and regimen-related distress, [II] health professional-related distress, [III] diabetes-related interpersonal distress.
Conclusions. When the translation and cultural adaptation process have been considered, the Diabetes Distress Scale is a valid and reliable tool for the Turkish community. It is recommended to be used in the studies and clinical trials.
Publisher
Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University
Reference33 articles.
1. Chaney D, Clarke A. Nursing care of conditions related to the endocrine system. In: Brady A-M, McCabe C, McCann M, editors. Fundamentals of medical-surgical nursing a systems approach. Wiley Blackw; 2014. pp. 298-325.
2. International of Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 9th edn. Brussels, Belgium: 2019. Available from: https://www.diabetesatlas.org
3. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults
4. A path model of health-related quality of life in Type 2 diabetic patients: a cross-sectional study in Taiwan
5. The confusing tale of depression and distress in patients with diabetes: a call for greater clarity and precision