Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Hong Kong
Abstract
I propose an axiomatic framework for belief revision when new information is qualitative, of the form “event
A is at least as likely as event
B.” My decision maker need not have beliefs about the joint distribution of the signal she will receive and the payoff‐relevant states. I propose three axioms,
Exchangeability,
Stationarity, and
Reduction, to characterize the class of
pseudo‐Bayesian updating rules. The key axiom,
Exchangeability, requires that the order in which the information arrives does not matter if the different pieces of information neither reinforce nor contradict each other. I show that adding one more axiom,
Conservatism, which requires that the decision maker adjust her beliefs just enough to embrace new information, yields Kullback–Leibler minimization: The decision maker selects the posterior closest to her prior in terms of Kullback–Leibler divergence from the probability measures consistent with newly received information. I show that pseudo‐Bayesian agents are susceptible to recency bias, which may be mitigated by repetitive learning.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Logic-based updating;Journal of Economic Theory;2024-10
2. Learning from a black box;Journal of Economic Theory;2024-10
3. Alternatives to Bayesian Updating;Annual Review of Economics;2024-08-22
4. Anchored belief updating from recommendations;Journal of Mathematical Economics;2024-02
5. Logic-Based Updating;2024