Affiliation:
1. Department of Economics, University of Michigan
2. NBER
Abstract
R&D investment reduces current profits, so short‐term pressure to hit profit targets may distort R&D. In the data, firms just meeting Wall Street forecasts have lower R&D growth and subsequent innovation, while managers just missing receive lower pay. But short‐termist distortions might not quantitatively matter if aggregation or equilibrium dampen their impact. So I build and estimate a quantitative endogenous growth model in which short‐termism arises naturally as discipline on conflicted managers and boosts firm value by about 1%. But short‐termism reduces R&D, and the social return to R&D is higher than the private return due to standard channels including knowledge spillovers and imperfect competition. So at the macro level, short‐termist distortions slow growth by 5 basis points yearly and lower social welfare by about 1%.
Funder
Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference92 articles.
1. A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction
2. Allen, Eric J., and Patricia M. Dechow (2013): “The ‘Rationality’ of the Long Distance Runner: Prospect Theory and the Marathon,” Working paper, SSRN 2342396.
3. Is It Time to Get Rid of Earnings-per-Share (EPS)?
4. Almeida, Heitor, Nuri Ersahin, Vyacheslav Fos, Rustom M. Irani, and Mathias Kronlund (2021): “Do Short-Term Incentives Affect Long-Term Productivity?” Working paper, SSRN 3412538.
5. Almeida, Heitor, Vyacheslav Fos, Po-Hsuan Hsu, Mathias Kronlund, and Kevin Tseng (2022): “Do Short-Term Incentives Hurt Innovation?” Working paper, SSRN 3663903.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献