Affiliation:
1. University of Alaska Fairbanks
2. Oberlin College
Abstract
Violence is a significant issue impacting the physical, mental, social, and economic health of our learning communities. For decades the discipline of peace education has explored the effects of nonphysical violence on students and educators, as well as ways to create more peaceful, less violent, and equitable educational practices. While communication frameworks have been used in peace education research, no research found has theorized the potential value of peace education for the communication discipline. Using the contextual background of communication centers, this piece seeks to disrupt steadfast norms and practices within communication centers from the perspective of peace education. We provide an overview of the field of peace education and explicate opportunities within the communication discipline to use peace education frameworks, theory, and practice to develop pedagogies of renewal and close with practical recommendations for communication centers going forward.
Publisher
Central States Communication Association
Reference74 articles.
1. Academics for Black Survival and Wellness. (n.d.). Home. https://www.academics4blacklives.com/
2. Arendale, D. R. (2004). Mainstreamed academic assistance and enrichment for all students: The historical origins of Learning Assistance Centers. Research for Education Reform, 9(4), 3–21.
3. Baesler, E. J., & Lauricella, S. (2012). Teach peace: Assessing instruction of the nonviolent communication and peace course. Journal of Peace Education, 11(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2013.777899
4. Bajaj, M. (2015). ‘Pedagogies of resistance’ and critical peace education praxis. Journal of Peace Education, 12(2), 154–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2014.991914
5. Baker-Bell, A. (2020). Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. Routledge.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献