Distinguishing between fractional Brownian motion with random and constant Hurst exponent using sample autocovariance-based statistics

Abstract

Fractional Brownian motion (FBM) is a canonical model for describing dynamics in various complex systems. It is characterized by the Hurst exponent, which is responsible for the correlation between FBM increments, its self-similarity property, and anomalous diffusion behavior. However, recent research indicates that the classical model may be insufficient in describing experimental observations when the anomalous diffusion exponent varies from trajectory to trajectory. As a result, modifications of the classical FBM have been considered in the literature, with a natural extension being the FBM with a random Hurst exponent. In this paper, we discuss the problem of distinguishing between two models: (i) FBM with the constant Hurst exponent and (ii) FBM with random Hurst exponent, by analyzing the probabilistic properties of statistics represented by the quadratic forms. These statistics have recently found application in Gaussian processes and have proven to serve as efficient tools for hypothesis testing. Here, we examine two statistics—the sample autocovariance function and the empirical anomaly measure—utilizing the correlation properties of the considered models. Based on these statistics, we introduce a testing procedure to differentiate between the two models. We present analytical and simulation results considering the two-point and beta distributions as exemplary distributions of the random Hurst exponent. Finally, to demonstrate the utility of the presented methodology, we analyze real-world datasets from the financial market and single particle tracking experiment in biological gels.