Exponential smoothing method against the gradient boosting machine learning algorithm-based model for materials forecasting to minimize inventory

Author:

Sathish T.1ORCID,SaiKumar Divity2,Patil Shashwath1ORCID,Saravanan R.1ORCID,Giri Jayant3ORCID,Aly Ayman A.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS 1 , Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

2. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS 2 , Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering 3 , Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University 4 , Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

The optimization of resources and reduction of costs through efficient inventory management are paramount to organizational success. This study undertakes a comparative analysis of two distinct forecasting methodologies, Exponential Smoothing (ES) and Gradient Boosting (GB), within the framework of materials forecasting aimed at inventory minimization. Our study introduces innovation by methodically scrutinizing these approaches within a unified framework, shedding light on their merits and shortcomings. This comparative analysis gives practitioners a practical roadmap for the optimal forecasting strategy to streamline inventory management operations. Methodologies are evaluated based on their efficiency in predicting material demand, encompassing metrics such as accuracy, computational efficiency, and suitability across various inventory management scenarios. Response surface methodology entails refining processes to modify factorial variables’ configurations to attain a desired peak or trough in response. The SPSS results show that the ES method has 43.20%, surpassing the accuracy of the inventory optimization model, which stood at 65.08%. The response surface methodology results show that 45.20% profit was achieved for the variable and operational cost process parameters. This research seeks to unveil the traces of each method, facilitating decision-makers in selecting an optimal forecasting strategy tailored to their specific inventory management requirements. The analysis shows that the ES method surpasses the accuracy of the GB machine learning for material forecasting to minimize inventory.

Funder

Taif University

Publisher

AIP Publishing

Reference25 articles.

1. Demand forecasting based machine learning algorithms on customer information: An applied approach;Int. J. Inf. Technol.,2022

2. Machine learning models for forecasting and estimation of business operations;J. High Technol. Manage. Res.,2023

3. J. N. C. Gonçalves , “Towards enhanced safety stock estimation: Exploring machine learning strategies for supply chain demand forecasting,” Doctoral dissertation (Universidade do Minho, Portugal, 2020).

4. O. Özdemir and C.Yozgatlıgil, “Performance comparison of machine learning methods and traditional time series methods for forecasting,” Doctoral dissertation (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Doğal Ve Uygulamalı Bilimler, Ankara, 2020).

5. Hybrid of deep learning and exponential smoothing for enhancing crime forecasting accuracy;PLoS One,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3