Comparison of different types of focusing probes in pulsed eddy current testing

Author:

Yang Fan1ORCID,Li Zhaoyang1ORCID,Fu Yuewen1ORCID,Huang Wenfeng1,Tang Chenhuai2,Cao Aisong2

Affiliation:

1. Key Laboratory of Nondestructive Testing (Ministry of Education), Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, People’s Republic of China

2. Shanghai Special Equipment Supervision and Inspection Technology Research Institute, Shanghai 200062, People’s Republic of China

Abstract

Pulsed eddy current (PEC) testing has attracted widespread attention because of its unique advantages in detecting local defects in insulated pipes. In this paper, rectangular, U-shaped, and semicircular PEC focusing probes are designed, the magnetic energy utilization efficiency and focusing properties of the developed probes are simulated and compared, and their detection sensitivities are experimentally compared. The magnetic flux through specific surfaces is calculated to find the utilization of magnetic energy by the different probes, and the eddy current dissipation power is used to quantitatively describe the eddy current field focusing properties of various types of probes. The simulation results show that the magnetic field energy utilization efficiency of the semicircular focusing probe is significantly higher than that of the other two probes, but the eddy current field distributions of the three probes are similar, and the focusing properties are not significantly different. The experimental results show that the three types of PEC probes can effectively detect local defects under a certain lift-off. By calculating the detection sensitivity of different probes to defects under different lift-off conditions, it is determined that the detection sensitivity of the semicircular probe is significantly higher than that of the U-shaped probe and rectangular probe. The experimental results are consistent with the numerical simulation results. The research results are conducive to the optimal design of PEC focusing probes for insulated pipes.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

AIP Publishing

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3