Abstract
The existing reservoir in the Yongjin block exhibits an extremely low matrix permeability, posing challenges in precisely evaluating the damage caused by fracturing fluid using traditional core flow experimental methods. Currently, there is no established quantitative method for characterizing the degree of damage. In this study, we integrated online nuclear magnetic resonance, microscopic computed tomography, and core displacement experimental techniques, pioneering a novel approach to evaluate damage in deep tight oil reservoirs subjected to hydraulic fracturing. We analyzed the influence patterns of key factors such as backflow pressure differential, shut-in time, invasion volume, and residual retention on rock matrix damage in the operational area. The study unveiled the mechanisms behind water sensitivity, water block, and fracturing fluid retention damage among oil, water, and rock. The results indicate that water sensitivity damage is less than 20%, primarily occurring within large pores. Water block damage can significantly reduce the residual oil permeability. Experimental findings suggest that optimizing liquid backflow with a pressure differential and well shut-in time set at 5 MPa and 9 days can markedly reduce the intrusion volume of gel-breaking fluid, restoring the residual oil permeability. Under high-pressure differential conditions, residual fracturing fluid can infiltrate the rock matrix, resulting in pore damage. Additionally, it can accumulate on the fracture surfaces, thereby reducing the permeability of microfractures.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Reference28 articles.
1. Effect of water blocking damage on flow efficiency and productivity in tight gas reservoirs,2011
2. Water blocking damage in hydraulically fractured tight sand gas reservoirs: An example from Perth Basin, Western Australia;J. Pet. Sci. Eng.,2012
3. Formation damage processes reducing productivity of low permeability gas reservoirs,2000
4. Pulse decay permeability: Analytical solution and experimental test;Soc. Pet. Eng. J.,1982