Data-driven modal decomposition methods as feature detection techniques for flow problems: A critical assessment

Author:

Begiashvili B.1ORCID,Groun N.12ORCID,Garicano-Mena J.13ORCID,Le Clainche S.13ORCID,Valero E.13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ETSI Aeronáutica y del Espacio, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid 1 , 28040 Madrid, Spain

2. ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid 2 , 28040 Madrid, Spain

3. Center for Computational Simulation (CCS) 3 , 28660 Boadilla del Monte, Spain

Abstract

Modal decomposition techniques are showing a fast growth in popularity for their wide range of applications and their various properties, especially as data-driven tools. There are many modal decomposition techniques, yet Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) and Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) are the most widespread methods, especially in the field of fluid dynamics. Following their highly competent performance on various applications in several fields, numerous extensions of these techniques have been developed. In this work, we present an ambitious review comparing eight different modal decomposition techniques, including most established methods, i.e., POD, DMD, and Fast Fourier Transform; extensions of these classical methods: based either on time embedding systems, Spectral POD and Higher Order DMD, or based on scales separation, multi-scale POD (mPOD) and multi-resolution DMD (mrDMD); and also a method based on the properties of the resolvent operator, the data-driven Resolvent Analysis. The performance of all these techniques will be evaluated on four different test cases: the laminar wake around cylinder, a turbulent jet flow, the three-dimensional wake around a cylinder in transient regime, and a transient and turbulent wake around a cylinder. All these mentioned datasets are publicly available. First, we show a comparison between the performance of the eight modal decomposition techniques when the datasets are shortened. Next, all the results obtained will be explained in detail, showing both the conveniences and inconveniences of all the methods under investigation depending on the type of application and the final goal (reconstruction or identification of the flow physics). In this contribution, we aim at giving a—as fair as possible—comparison of all the techniques investigated. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first time a review paper gathering all these techniques have been produced, clarifying to the community what is the best technique to use for each application.

Funder

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

European Union "NextGenerationEU"/PRTR

INDUSTRIAL LEADERSHIP

Publisher

AIP Publishing

Subject

Condensed Matter Physics,Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Mechanics of Materials,Computational Mechanics,Mechanical Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3