Expectations on Physics Textbooks

Author:

Grusche Sascha1ORCID,Strahl Alexander2ORCID,Bardy Katrin Bölsterli3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University Library, Technical University of Munich , D-80333 München, Germany

2. University of Salzburg , A-5020 Salzburg, Austria

3. University of Teacher Education Lucerne , CH-6003 Lucerne, Switzerland

Abstract

In the physics classroom and outside, physics textbooks are important for teaching and learning physics. Regarding the content and form of physics textbooks, different people have different expectations. However, there is no systematic overview of expectations held by these people, ranging from curriculum-makers, publishers and authors to teachers, students, and education researchers. Therefore, this chapter provides a literature review of research papers about physics textbook expectations. All relevant sections of these papers are analyzed with a system of deductive categories, and the results of the analysis are generalized in inductive categories. Regarding content, textbooks are expected to be course-matching, nature-of-science-oriented, competence-oriented, stereotype-free, curriculum-aligned, interdisciplinary, student-oriented, teacher-oriented, context-based, and error-free. Regarding form, textbooks are expected to be multi-representational, content-method-aligned, clearly laid-out, fulfilling external criteria, fully digital, and research-based. Regarding actions around the textbook, teachers are expected to choose a suitable textbook and encourage textbook use, students are expected to supplement the textbook and read it critically, and education researchers are expected to analyze textbooks and evaluate their effects on students’ learning. Overall, expectation holders are expected to interact more. The expectations stated in the papers are mostly normative or literature-based, but rarely empirical. Moreover, there is almost no relationship between the papers. Therefore, physics textbooks expectations research is not a research field of its own, yet. Creators and users of textbooks should learn from each other more so that the textbooks can be improved.

Publisher

AIP Publishing LLCMelville, New York

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3