Insights into elastic properties of coarse-grained DNA models: q-stiffness of cgDNA vs cgDNA+

Author:

Laeremans Wout123ORCID,Segers Midas2ORCID,Voorspoels Aderik2ORCID,Carlon Enrico2ORCID,Hooyberghs Jef3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Soft Matter and Biological Physics, Department of Applied Physics, and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology 1 , P.O. Box 513, 5600MB Eindhoven, Netherlands

2. Soft Matter and Biophysics Unit, KU Leuven 2 , Celestijnenlaan 200D, 3001 Leuven, Belgium

3. UHasselt, Faculty of Sciences, Data Science Institute, Theory Lab 3 , Agoralaan, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium

Abstract

Coarse-grained models have emerged as valuable tools to simulate long DNA molecules while maintaining computational efficiency. These models aim at preserving interactions among coarse-grained variables in a manner that mirrors the underlying atomistic description. We explore here a method for testing coarse-grained vs all-atom models using stiffness matrices in Fourier space (q-stiffnesses), which are particularly suited to probe DNA elasticity at different length scales. We focus on a class of coarse-grained rigid base DNA models known as cgDNA and its most recent version, cgDNA+. Our analysis shows that while cgDNA+ closely follows the q-stiffnesses of the all-atom model, the original cgDNA shows some deviations for twist and bending variables, which are rather strong in the q → 0 (long length scale) limit. The consequence is that while both cgDNA and cgDNA+ give a suitable description of local elastic behavior, the former misses some effects that manifest themselves at longer length scales. In particular, cgDNA performs poorly on twist stiffness, with a value much lower than expected for long DNA molecules. Conversely, the all-atom and cgDNA+ twist are strongly length scale dependent: DNA is torsionally soft at a few base pair distances but becomes more rigid at distances of a few dozen base pairs. Our analysis shows that the bending persistence length in all-atom and cgDNA+ is somewhat overestimated.

Funder

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Publisher

AIP Publishing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3