Factors that enable breakthroughs in tennis: A case study of elite college tennis players in Japan

Author:

Hioki Kazuki,Hotta Shion,Iba Takashi

Abstract

In the world of sports, the phenomenon of a dramatic improvement in competition results at some point is called a “breakthrough.” In this study, “breakthrough” is defined as “a dramatic improvement in competition results at some point,” and the purpose of this study is to reveal hypothetical findings on the factors that enable “breakthroughs” in tennis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight Japanese college tennis players who had experienced a “breakthrough” in the past, and who had records of being in the top 8 or above in national championships. The interview content was transcribed and used to conduct a qualitative analysis. As a result, the following three hypothetical findings were revealed: “maintaining high motivation,” “continuous growth,” and “high performance during games” are important for enabling “breakthroughs” in tennis. Those hypothetical findings will be useful information for athletes who are aiming for “breakthroughs” and for coaches who support them.

Publisher

International Tennis Federation

Reference31 articles.

1. Arimitsu, K. (2002). Examining varieties, the factor structure, and differentiations of the coping strategies of “agari” (stage fright) in its eliciting situation. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 72(6), 482-489. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.72.482

2. Baumeister, R.F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 13, 610-620. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.610

3. Butt, D. S., & Cox, D. N. (1992). Motivational patterns in Davis Cup, university and recreational tennis players. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23(1), 1-13.

4. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp.129-186). University of Minnesota Press.

5. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H.A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive psychology, 4(1), 55-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3