Affiliation:
1. Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
2. Cornell University
3. University of Washington
Abstract
The growth of social reading platforms such as Goodreads and LibraryThing enables us to analyze reading activity at very large scale and in remarkable detail. But twenty-first century systems give us a perspective only on contemporary readers. Meanwhile, the digitization of the lending library records of Shakespeare and Company provides a window into the reading activity of an earlier, smaller community in interwar Paris. In this article, we explore the extent to which we can make comparisons between the Shakespeare and Company and Goodreads communities. By quantifying similarities and differences, we can identify patterns in how works have risen or fallen in popularity across these datasets. We can also measure differences in how works are received by measuring similarities and differences in co-reading patterns. Finally, by examining the complete networks of co-readership, we can observe changes in the overall structures of literary reception.
Publisher
CA: Journal of Cultural Analytics
Reference15 articles.
1. Tags, Borders, and Catalogs: Social Re-Working of Genre on LibraryThing;Maria Antoniak;Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction,2021
2. Models of core/periphery structures;Stephen P. Borgatti;Social Networks,2000
3. Divergence and the Complexity of Difference in Text and Culture;Kent K. Chang;Journal of Cultural Analytics,2020
4. France Emma Raphaël;ArtNet,2020
5. A clarified typology of core-periphery structure in networks;Ryan J. Gallagher;Science Advances,2021
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Virginia Woolf’s Common Readers in Paris;Journal of Cultural Analytics;2024-05-29
2. Missing Data, Speculative Reading;Journal of Cultural Analytics;2024-05-29